Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Advanced Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Advanced Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Advanced Consulting Group holds $4.5M in lifetime obligations with a 93.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Advanced Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $4.5M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Advanced Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.5%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Advanced Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Advanced Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$4.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.6M
Recompete Win Rate:93.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Advanced Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence