Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

AeroDynamics Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between AeroDynamics Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: AeroDynamics Consulting Group holds $11.7M in lifetime obligations with a 72.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

AeroDynamics Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $11.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
AeroDynamics Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 72.5%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
AeroDynamics Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

AeroDynamics Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$11.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.8M
Recompete Win Rate:72.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:14
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336992
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
AeroDynamics Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence