Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
AeroDynamics Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between AeroDynamics Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: AeroDynamics Consulting Group holds $43.7M in lifetime obligations with a 85.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•AeroDynamics Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $43.7M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•AeroDynamics Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 85.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•AeroDynamics Consulting Group Top Agency: General Services Administration
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →AeroDynamics Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.8M
Recompete Win Rate:85.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:12
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332993
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512