Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Applied Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Applied Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Applied Global Services holds $16.3M in lifetime obligations with a 77.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Applied Global Services Lifetime Spend: $16.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Applied Global Services Recompete Win %: 77.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Applied Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Applied Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.8M
Recompete Win Rate:77.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:5
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):339113
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Applied Global Services
UEI: T86E28ESW56F • Washington, NC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA