Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH and THE BOEING COMPANY: ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH holds $13.9M in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH Lifetime Spend: $13.9M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →ARBOR RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE FOR HEALTH
Total Lifetime Obligations:$13.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.9M
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512