Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. holds $6.08B in lifetime obligations with a 88.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. Lifetime Spend: $6.08B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. Recompete Win %: 88.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P. Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BAE SYSTEMS LAND AND ARMAMENTS L.P.
Total Lifetime Obligations:$6.08B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.13B
Recompete Win Rate:88.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:3
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512