Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP holds $11.12B in lifetime obligations with a 92.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Lifetime Spend: $11.12B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Recompete Win %: 92.4%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$11.12B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.89B
Recompete Win Rate:92.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:2
Average Award Cycle:35 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512