Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP holds $11.12B in lifetime obligations with a 92.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Lifetime Spend: $11.12B

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Recompete Win %: 92.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$11.12B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.89B

Recompete Win Rate:92.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:2

Average Award Cycle:35 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512