Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $8.0M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $8.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$8.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.9M
Recompete Win Rate:83.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:12
Average Award Cycle:45 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512