Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $8.0M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $8.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$8.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.9M
Recompete Win Rate:83.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:12
Average Award Cycle:45 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512