Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $1.21B in lifetime obligations with a 80.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $1.21B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 80.5%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.21B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$361.1M
Recompete Win Rate:80.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:139
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512