Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $1.21B in lifetime obligations with a 80.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $1.21B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 80.5%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.21B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$361.1M
Recompete Win Rate:80.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:139
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
BioHealth Consulting Group
UEI: EJ34HGWYAW0B • Washington, ME
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA