Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $430.7M in lifetime obligations with a 86.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $430.7M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$430.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$191.2M
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:70
Average Award Cycle:32 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):236220
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512