Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $3.1M in lifetime obligations with a 90.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $3.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.1M
Recompete Win Rate:90.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512