Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $3.1M in lifetime obligations with a 90.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $3.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.1M
Recompete Win Rate:90.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence