Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $814.1M in lifetime obligations with a 90.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $814.1M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$814.1M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$267.2M

Recompete Win Rate:90.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:167

Average Award Cycle:59 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541611

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512