Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: BioHealth Consulting Group holds $814.1M in lifetime obligations with a 90.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•BioHealth Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $814.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•BioHealth Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.0%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•BioHealth Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$814.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$267.2M
Recompete Win Rate:90.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:167
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512