Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: BioHealth Engineering Group holds $17.5M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

BioHealth Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $17.5M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
BioHealth Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
BioHealth Engineering Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$17.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.5M
Recompete Win Rate:83.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
BioHealth Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence