Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
BioHealth Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Engineering Group holds $17.5M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•BioHealth Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $17.5M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•BioHealth Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•BioHealth Engineering Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →BioHealth Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$17.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.5M
Recompete Win Rate:83.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512