Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Engineering Group holds $17.5M in lifetime obligations with a 83.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•BioHealth Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $17.5M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•BioHealth Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.9%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•BioHealth Engineering Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$17.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.5M

Recompete Win Rate:83.9%

Active Prime Task Orders:26

Average Award Cycle:49 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512