Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

BioHealth Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between BioHealth Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: BioHealth Global Services holds $27.1M in lifetime obligations with a 91.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

BioHealth Global Services Lifetime Spend: $27.1M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
BioHealth Global Services Recompete Win %: 91.4%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
BioHealth Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

BioHealth Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$27.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.2M
Recompete Win Rate:91.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541211
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
BioHealth Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence