Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $39.4M in lifetime obligations with a 91.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $39.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Justice

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Blue Water Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.7M

Recompete Win Rate:91.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:27

Average Award Cycle:50 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541620

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512