Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $33.7M in lifetime obligations with a 76.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $33.7M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.7%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Justice
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Blue Water Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.5M
Recompete Win Rate:76.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334419
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence