Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Water Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $37.7M in lifetime obligations with a 89.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $37.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Blue Water Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$16.2M
Recompete Win Rate:89.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334419
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Blue Water Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence