Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $30.9M in lifetime obligations with a 82.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $30.9M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 82.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Blue Water Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.6M
Recompete Win Rate:82.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:52 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):236220
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512