Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $44.2M in lifetime obligations with a 76.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $44.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.0%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Blue Water Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$44.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:76.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:35 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Blue Water Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence