Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Blue Water Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Blue Water Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Blue Water Consulting Group holds $44.2M in lifetime obligations with a 76.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Blue Water Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $44.2M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Blue Water Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 76.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Blue Water Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Blue Water Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$44.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:76.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:35 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336413
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Blue Water Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence