Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Applied Sciences holds $42.1M in lifetime obligations with a 79.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Bravo Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $42.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Bravo Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.4%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Bravo Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.9M
Recompete Win Rate:79.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Bravo Applied Sciences
UEI: 6UJZ0P05XSKL • Washington, ME
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX