Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Bravo Applied Sciences holds $42.1M in lifetime obligations with a 77.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Bravo Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $42.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Bravo Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 77.3%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Bravo Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:77.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336414
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Bravo Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence