Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Engineering Group holds $985.4M in lifetime obligations with a 85.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $985.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 85.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$985.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$401.9M

Recompete Win Rate:85.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:165

Average Award Cycle:33 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541380

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512