Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Engineering Group holds $39.6M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $39.6M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 88.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.7M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence