Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Bravo Engineering Group holds $39.6M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $39.6M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 88.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.7M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Bravo Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence