Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Engineering Group holds $66.2M in lifetime obligations with a 95.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $66.2M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 95.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Bravo Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$66.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$27.0M
Recompete Win Rate:95.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:145
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541310
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512