Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Engineering Group holds $13.2M in lifetime obligations with a 84.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $13.2M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 84.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Bravo Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$13.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.5M
Recompete Win Rate:84.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:6
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512