Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Bravo Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Bravo Engineering Group holds $779.0M in lifetime obligations with a 90.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $779.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 90.0%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Energy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Bravo Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$779.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$159.7M
Recompete Win Rate:90.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:139
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561320
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512