Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Bravo Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Bravo Engineering Group holds $779.0M in lifetime obligations with a 90.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Bravo Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $779.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Bravo Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 90.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Bravo Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Energy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Bravo Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$779.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$159.7M
Recompete Win Rate:90.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:139
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561320
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512