Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Bravo Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Bravo Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Bravo Technical Services holds $24.0M in lifetime obligations with a 81.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Bravo Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $24.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Bravo Technical Services Recompete Win %: 81.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Bravo Technical Services Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Bravo Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.7M
Recompete Win Rate:81.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:7
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Bravo Technical Services
UEI: JSVG0X73MGDZ • Washington, ID
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA