Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $251.3M in lifetime obligations with a 81.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $251.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 81.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Applied Sciences
Total Lifetime Obligations:$251.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.5M
Recompete Win Rate:81.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:127
Average Award Cycle:45 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541715
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512