Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $251.3M in lifetime obligations with a 81.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $251.3M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 81.0%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$251.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.5M

Recompete Win Rate:81.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:127

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541715

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512