Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $36.0M in lifetime obligations with a 77.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $36.0M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 77.3%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$36.0M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.3M

Recompete Win Rate:77.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:26

Average Award Cycle:58 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512