Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $36.0M in lifetime obligations with a 77.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $36.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 77.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$36.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.3M
Recompete Win Rate:77.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Centurion Applied Sciences
UEI: 29RJDGY9NG3R • Washington, AZ
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX