Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $36.0M in lifetime obligations with a 77.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $36.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 77.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Applied Sciences
Total Lifetime Obligations:$36.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.3M
Recompete Win Rate:77.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512