Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Applied Sciences holds $41.2M in lifetime obligations with a 73.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Centurion Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $41.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Centurion Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 73.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Centurion Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$41.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.2M
Recompete Win Rate:73.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence