Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Centurion Consulting Group holds $13.6M in lifetime obligations with a 93.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Centurion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $13.6M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Centurion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Centurion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$13.6M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.9M

Recompete Win Rate:93.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:25

Average Award Cycle:48 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561612

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512