Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Consulting Group holds $13.6M in lifetime obligations with a 93.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $13.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$13.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.9M
Recompete Win Rate:93.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512