Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Consulting Group holds $17.0M in lifetime obligations with a 82.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Centurion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $17.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Centurion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 82.8%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Centurion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$17.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.8M
Recompete Win Rate:82.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541211
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512