Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Consulting Group holds $16.0M in lifetime obligations with a 89.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $16.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.4M
Recompete Win Rate:89.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:55 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541110
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512