Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Consulting Group holds $41.3M in lifetime obligations with a 92.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $41.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Centurion Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 92.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$41.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.1M
Recompete Win Rate:92.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512