Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Defense Systems holds $20.7M in lifetime obligations with a 72.1% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Centurion Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $20.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Centurion Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 72.1%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Centurion Defense Systems Top Agency: General Services Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$20.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.8M
Recompete Win Rate:72.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence