Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Defense Systems and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Defense Systems holds $15.4M in lifetime obligations with a 87.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Centurion Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $15.4M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Centurion Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 87.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Centurion Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of Energy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.8M
Recompete Win Rate:87.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):492110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Defense Systems vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence