Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Defense Systems holds $15.4M in lifetime obligations with a 87.5% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Centurion Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $15.4M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Centurion Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 87.5%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Centurion Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of Energy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.8M
Recompete Win Rate:87.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):492110
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence