Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Defense Systems holds $9.8M in lifetime obligations with a 84.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Centurion Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $9.8M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Centurion Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 84.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Centurion Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$9.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.7M
Recompete Win Rate:84.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:13
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Centurion Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence