Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Centurion Engineering Group holds $24.6M in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Centurion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $24.6M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•Centurion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Centurion Engineering Group Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.4M
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512