Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Centurion Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Centurion Engineering Group holds $24.6M in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Centurion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $24.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Centurion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Centurion Engineering Group Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Centurion Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.4M
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512