Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Centurion Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Centurion Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Centurion Engineering Group holds $30.8M in lifetime obligations with a 83.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Centurion Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $30.8M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Centurion Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Centurion Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Centurion Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.8M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.3M

Recompete Win Rate:83.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:25

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):339113

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512